These Are The Harper Government Nasty Crap Files Title

These Are The Harper Government Nasty Crap Files Choice Little Criticisms of Conservative Arrogance, Lies and Stupidity

The Components of Character - Stephen and His Government Run Short

Trustworthiness. Respect. Responsibility. Fairness. Caring. Citizenship.

The standards of conduct that arise out of these values constitute the ground rules of ethics.

The Conservatives Obviously Skipped That Class

Regarding the Long Waits


Why the Long Waits for Applications Processing?

The Lame Excuse of Workload, and Priority, and High Volumes

I would like to find out why the approval process for any application is months long. I possess a B.A. in Organizational Psychology with a minor in Statistics and I know bad performance when I see it. From my observations so far I can’t help but conclude there is high probability that the wait list and delay is a deliberately structured obstruction of the purpose of the Regulations. Considering the purpose of the forms, I have examined the forms and they are not all that complex. As far as the processing of these applications: their approval should be a simple verification that all the required information is provided, that it appears to be correct and that it is keypunched into your system. I specifically note that processing is not a consideration of the merit of any applicant or condition. The merit of the applicant and his condition is supplied by the submission of a completed Form B1 or B2 and MMAD’s function is only to confirm its conformity to MMAR requirements re its manner of completion. If all the information is provided is deemed complete and acceptable, approval of the application should be automatic and not be a matter of months. 
Please advise if these assumptions are not correct and how they depart from reality.

Based on the foregoing assumptions, I put myself in place of MMAD and I took the time to fill in every piece of information required to complete the 5 most common Application forms, A,B1,B2,C,D and then processed and checked them for accuracy as a batch. The results are not impressive given the complexity of the task and the skill sets required of any one of your data entry personnel.
The task of processing seems simple. To check every one of the 5 forms I was required to look a total of 144 times at a blank filled with usually a one word answer or a little box to be checked. In only a half dozen of these questions was there a requirement for more than a one or two sentence answer that had to be typed in.
For each of these 144 responses your clerk must look at a the answer in a blank, read it, verify it is what was asked for and type not usually more than a dozen letters to enter the data into your system. If I allow a complete minute for each blank to be verified I come up with a maximum process time of just over two hours. Considering that with my ability as a typist I managed to complete the form on my PC in 1 hour, it is reasonable to conclude that the time required for a professional government claims examiner to complete the task as part of a repetitive routine should be significantly faster. Please correct me if I am wrong.

Why is there a backlog and waitlist of months for applications that can be processed in a matter of minutes? I want to find out and so far no one will give me straight answers.

The vast majority of applications consist of a 2 or more of the following
Form A :Form B1 :Form B2: Form C :Form D

Following you will find a little exercise in the analysis of your application wait list problem. The results require some explanation. In addition to the processing problem I have identified a couple of other areas that are problematic and I intend to follow up with questions regarding each.


“Health Canada is currently experiencing a temporary delay in processing applications for an authorization to possess and/or a licence to produce marihuana for medical purposes, due to a sharp rise in the number of applications received in recent months.
To address this situation, Health Canada has implemented a strategy that is improving the efficiency of its review and authorization process and will restore standard processing times of 8 to 10 weeks.”

Who are you trying to kid? MMAD has had a long backlog for years and the MMAR were revised in 2006 to shorten the wait time. I note the “standard processing times of 8 to 10 weeks”. That is a ridiculous time span for an activity that, even allowing for bureaucratic slack should take no more than one week considering that MMAD’s role is confined to “review and authorization” of simple applications. 

I took the liberty of completely filling out Forms A, B1, B2, C, and D and then took a critical look at exactly what had to be reviewed and authorized. It adds up to 140 blanks and boxes to verify as required and readable, and includes only three areas that require more than cursory attention.
I was liberal with time allowances. I allowed 10 seconds for a clerical entry: i.e. most are answers to very simple: yes, no or tick a box. Think about ten seconds, hold your breath for that long. How long does it take to look at a blank and see if it has a signature in it?
The 5 minute allowance for Medical and Grower is more than adequate: Each has 9 entries at 10 seconds @ and the balance of 3+ minutes to make a judgement as to acceptability.
The final review requires no judgement as to acceptability of the application or the medical condition unless there is an omission or problem. In short, if all the blanks are properly filled in then approval should be automatic.

Entries to be Reviewed
Number of Entries
Time allowed  (each)
Time (Seconds)
Time (Total)
Clerical Entries
120
10 sec
1200
20 min
Medical Information
10
30 sec
300
5 min
Grower Information
10
30 sec
300
5 min
Final Review
1
5 min
300
5 min
Total Process Time



35 min






I simply cannot understand how an application of 5 forms that, takes less than one hour to thoroughly check on receipt and verify as complete and acceptable, somehow gets delayed a matter of months by MMAD processing.

And this is the crew of efficiency experts Revising the Regulations?

Not my choice!

No comments:

Post a Comment